Minimum Viable Personal Branding for Writers and Journalists

I think I’ve articulated how I feel about conscious efforts at “personal branding” before–if you have to put a lot of effort into it, your work may be lacking–but the question of whether it’s important generally has come up a couple of times in the MFA class I teach, and in talks to j-school students, so below are some thoughts. I don’t think you need to spend a lot of time and energy on cultivating your “personal brand”, which in my experience, means everything from the way people perceive you socially to whether you have every available eponymous social media handle on the Internet to what sort of name recognition you get in your chosen field. But I think there’s a minimum amount of work you have to do to make sure that people looking to recruit you get a sense of your best work and what you’re aiming to do in the long term.

1) If you’re just starting out and don’t have a big body of work yet, or a recognizable name, you probably need something on the Internet that articulates what your skills are and provides samples of your work. 

Hiring managers will Google you. The first thing they find should be what you actively want to present. It doesn’t have to be a big deal–a website on your own domain with existing clips and some sort of statement about your work history and what you’re interested in doing professionally is fine. (No, you don’t have to start a goddamned blog.) If you don’t have that, you’re somewhat at the mercy of what third party sites on the Internet say about you–which, best case, will be a scattershot cross-section of your work, and worst case, it’ll include pics of that trip to Ibiza that one time when you were a sophomore in college and oh god, let’s just not go there.

2) You should be on Facebook and Twitter, at the very least, and not because anyone expects you to be a prolific Tweeter or poster to Facebook. 

You should be on those platforms because they are a crucial component of how news–and ultimately your writing–gets delivered to readers. If you staunchly refuse to participate in social media, for whatever reason, you’re telegraphing that you either don’t understand that, or don’t care. Both of those platforms can also be valuable journalistic tools when used properly, and not availing yourself of them handicaps you. This doesn’t mean you have to Tweet all the time or post to Facebook regularly, but you need to know what’s going on there.

3) If you don’t have clips that are representative of what you think you want to be writing, then assign yourself a handful of those stories and just go do them. Then post them to your personal site. This is especially useful if you want to switch beats.

If you write a good story and post it to your personal site, you’re giving me an idea of what you’re capable of, even if your clips don’t reflect that. And I’m not going to discount a really good story on the basis that you published it on YourName.com and not TheNewYorker.com. Incidentally, this sort of thing is not what people mean when they talk disdainfully about writing for free. You are writing for yourself in this case, and you are the only one who benefits.

Writing the kind of stories, or critical pieces, or essays that you want to be writing ultimately is a way of signaling that you’re interested and you can do it. This is particularly important if you’re already covering a beat and want to switch to another. I’ve had a lot of good journalists and writers apply for a totally different beat and get knocked out of the process because there’s no indication in their work history or anywhere else that they actually have an interest in the new beat and have done anything to cultivate it. If you want to go from writing about molecular gastronomy to national politics, I need to see somewhere that your interest in politics is serious. I can’t just take your word for it.

You don’t need an extensive body of work, but you do need two or three things you can highlight that establish your interests and ability.

4) If you’re looking to be a critic or opinion writer, you need public work that showcases your point of view, your style and your ability to make an argument.

It’s unlikely at the entry level that you’re going to find very many paid outlets that will publish you on spec solely for the promise of your potentially brilliant analysis. Positions as columnists and critics tend to be awarded to people who’ve already established some sort of expertise in their field. But one way around that–again!–is to just start doing it. It establishes that you’re capable of producing that kind of work, and that you’re good at it. (In that case, you may actually want to start a goddamned blog, but any representative body of work will do.)

5) If you’re an established writer or journalist, you can get away with not doing any of those things. That doesn’t mean that your less experienced colleagues can.

I am not writing this for you.  However, I would ask that you not imply to journos-of-lesser-experience that all of these things are stupid and needless just because you think the Internet is destroying journalism and the work will speak for itself and so on. You are speaking from a point of privilege. The media environment was not as competitive when you started out (the number of j-school and MFA grads has exploded in the last 10 years and the number of jobs has not grown commensurately) and “Google” existed only as the misspelling of a very large number. If you dismiss these things, you are doing them a disservice.

 

 

  • docbiz

    The internet is the most powerful branding tool any writer should use. Once your piece is written and on the net it stays there and can be viewed by many. However, the better way to build your brand as a writer is on all the social media platforms. If you are not on the web – get going !

  • http://500startups.com/ Dave McClure

    great piece. most folks don’t think this through hardly at all.

    • http://www.elizabethspiers.com Elizabeth Spiers

      Thanks, Dave!

    • http://www.pornhub.com/ Zag Dust

      tight.

  • Kate Mielitz, AFC(R)

    I started blogging this year and have found that the more things I can connect to my primary platform, the more I can bring in practical application of what I’m talking about, the better the response, and frankly, it DOES build my brand, defining who I am and what I’m about on my terms. Integrating my new blog with social media hasn’t gone as quickly as I’d like, but the best things take time. Well written article with great tips that can easily be applied.

  • http://popsmoke.net/ Matt

    There’s still people getting out of the mililtary who feel they don’t need to have an online presence. Smh. Solid post, I love your layout.

  • XBeentere87

    i found this genuine site through s0 much search because their are maximum sites are fake. Y0u can definetly try this

  • XBeentere87

    Since I started my own buslness

  • XBeentere87

    IIUIUIUIU

  • XBeentere87

    Since I started my own BUSlNESS I am getting approx 100

  • XBeentere87

    I am getting approx 100

  • XBeentere87

    Since I started my own BUSlNESS

  • XBeentere87

    It sounds unbelievable

  • XBeentere87

    & now with

  • XBeentere87

    steps.

  • XBeentere87

    very

  • XBeentere87

    i found this genuine site through so much search because their

  • XBeentere87

    sites

  • XBeentere87

    are fake.

  • XBeentere87

    mjjjgj

  • XBeentere87

    are maximum sites are fake.

  • XBeentere87

    You can definetly

  • XBeentere87

    try this

  • XBeentere87

    everyd@y. It sounds unbelievable & now with very e@sy steps

  • BAntur1977

    his year and have found that the more things I can connect to my primary platform, the more I can b

  • BAntur1977

    before I looked at the receipt 9175 , I did not believe that my friend really bringing in so much part time . He started doing this for less a yr & now can’t think about closing it. Its awsome.

    You can definetly click this .,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,

    changethinking@887

  • Mely1932

    FGHJK

  • Mely1932

    MJHHUTY

  • Mely1932

    JJHGHGHUGH

  • Mely1932

    changethinking

  • Mely1932

    HGFHGFHFG

  • Mely1932
  • Mely1932

    jjgjghj

  • Mely1932

    task

  • Jane Weir

    Very nice. I use the same WP theme for one of my sites (which is just a crazy novel-in-progress about a foodie magazine). It gets the job done. I think I’ll use the theme for a Personal Branding Site for myself as a writer, because I used to be a working pro in the olden days but have mainly worked in another field in recent years. Thank you for the suggestion, and I wish I could remember why your name is familiar.

  • http://billbennett.co.nz billbennett

    I’ve wo as a journalist for more than 30 years. My back catalogue of work must run to well over a million words. My name is well known in my field, in New Zealand where I now live and also in Australia where I worked.

    And yet even now, with all that history, most of my freelance work comes in through my personal website. That’s how people find me. Trust me, it works. It’s a gateway to more interesting and better paying work.

  • http://mediajunkie.com/ xian

    Not only is this great advice for aspiring professional writers, but I suspect most of it is good career advice for nearly anyone.

    I’d emphasize “…a website on your own domain…”

  • http://hashtrax.com/ #WhoWhat

    A freshly brewed #Hashtag may serve you many purposes. We have made it #CrossSM searchable at: e.g. http://hashtrax.com/ELIZABETHSPIERS

  • Anna Kane

    Very well said. I’m always amazed when a writer is able to articulate a point as if it were tailored the many nuances and personal associations/caveats standing guard at the gates of my understanding. The succinctness of the article( particularly the explanation of why it’s important not to be social media ostrich) have inspired me to put my appreciation into action. Thank you Elizabeth Spiers. A flash of inspiration in line with your closing arguments reference to Google, I urge you to take on N as your middle initial. Cheesy? Perhaps. But I went there 😉 so I feel good about it. Thanks again for your insight.